University of Michigan Student Government Unanimously Passes Resolution Demanding Divestment from “Israel”
Determined in their cause, the Student Government will follow the resolution with a plan to “lead a university-wide initiative to collect sufficient petition signatures to convince university administration and the board of regents to form a committee to investigate moral or ethical implications of investments in companies and/or institutions that sustain Israel’s violation of international law.”
Needless to say, these bold actions will stir up considerable contraversey. We need to show our support. Please send an encouraging e-mail to ldibra@umich.edu and umdsg2@umich.edu.
The full text of the resolution is included after the links below.
Read more:
- PDF: Press Release: Student Government Resolution on Divestment
- PDF: Full Text of Student Government Resolution on Divestment
- The Detroit News: Students want U-M to divest from Israel
Full Text of the Resolution
General Assembly Resolution # 2006-001
Adopted Sep. 27th, 2006
Whereas, this wise body has been known to be one of strong moral and social conscience and has in the past supported justice and international law, and
Whereas, U.N General Assembly Resolution 194 resolves that the Holy Places - including
Whereas, U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194 further resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible, and
Whereas, many of faith, including but not limited to Palestinians, are denied free access to religious buildings and sites, and
Whereas, Palestinian refugees have still not been allowed to return to their homes and allowed the chance to live in peace with their neighbors and furthermore, most of their property has been either demolished or destroyed by
Whereas, the aforementioned situations prove that
Whereas, U.N Security Council Resolution 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from the territories occupied in the 1967 conflict and the termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force, and
Whereas, the State of Israel violates dozens of U.N. General assembly and Security Council Resolutions, causing conflict and suffering, and
Whereas, the territories of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank (including
Whereas, all of the aforementioned territories, except for the
Whereas, the Fourth Geneva Convention states that the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into territories it occupies, and
Whereas,
Whereas, this is reaffirmed by U.N. Security Council Resolution 446, which states that "the policy and practices of
Whereas,
Whereas, the complete and conscious disregard for Palestinians living under occupation has resulted in excessive use of force leading to tremendous civilian casualties, curfews imposed on entire communities sometimes for weeks on end, state sanctioned destruction of the environment and agriculture of mostly Palestinian lands (often times to build illegal settlements in the
Whereas, numerous organizations around the world including but definitely not limited to Amnesty International, the United Nations, the
Whereas,
Whereas, during this 34 day aggression against
Whereas, the
Whereas, Raytheon, General Electric, United Technologies, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman are all directly involved in the Israeli occupation, military aggression and profit from many of
Whereas, the investments in these six companies alone are valued at over $12,000,000, and
Whereas, University policy states that if a particular issue regarding the investment portfolio "involves serious moral or ethical questions," then "an advisory committee consisting of members of the University Senate, students, administration and alumni will be appointed to gather information and formulate recommendations for the Regent's consideration."
Therefore be it Resolved, that the
Be it Further Resolved, that on behalf of the students at the
Be it Further Resolved, that until
Labels: current_events, Palestine
1 Comments:
This is very much like what the Free Burma Coalition and the Free Nigeria student movements did in the 90's. We had a lot of success and it was passed in many campuses, and later, we targeted cities to pass such resolutions/ordinances. The last major city to pass the Free Burma Ordinace was Los Angeles in 1998. There was much debate because by passing the ordinance, L.A. could no longer do business with major investors in Burma such as ARCO. The resolution passed, and 3 months later ARCO divested all business from Myanmar. Five years later, after most major companies had left Burma because of student movement's passing resolutions, Bush signed a full sanctions on Myanmar. As a note, student movements had been asking for the passing of federal sanctions since early 90's, but the US position was "constructive engagement", but everyone knew the policy was really about letting resource explorations by American companies to continue. As pressure was put on these companies from these local ordinances being passed, one by one major companies like Pepsi, Levis, Unocal, and Arco eventually pulled out. It was only until everyone pulled out that the US decided to conveniently change its "constructive engagement" policy to what the burmese activists had always asked for, full sanctions.
I don't know that this will work with Israel though. Everyone in the US has no problem disagreeing that major human rights violations and the usurping of democracy in Burma has occured, but to get everyone on the same page about Israel is much harder. Furthermore, what made the Free Burma Coaltion successful was it had major funding from people like George Soros, not to mention a lot of volunteers from reputable lawyers who were passionate about the Burma issue. About 85% of the Free Burma Coalition were American students, not Burmese. Just passing the resolutions is hard enough, but the harder part is following up to make sure the Universities/Cities enforce the resolution and actually divest. This can be harder if there is no legal help. I respect the efforts with this divestment resolution, but I'm not sure it will be too successful in the long run.
Post a Comment
<< Home