Wednesday, October 04, 2006

University of Michigan Student Government Unanimously Passes Resolution Demanding Divestment from “Israel”

The Student Government at the University of Michigan - Dearborn took a bold step in unanimously passing a resolution demanding the University “cease all investment in companies that financially benefit from the actions of the Israeli military in illegally occupied territories.”

Determined in their cause, the Student Government will follow the resolution with a plan to “lead a university-wide initiative to collect sufficient petition signatures to convince university administration and the board of regents to form a committee to investigate moral or ethical implications of investments in companies and/or institutions that sustain Israel’s violation of international law.”

Needless to say, these bold actions will stir up considerable contraversey. We need to show our support. Please send an encouraging e-mail to ldibra@umich.edu and umdsg2@umich.edu.

The full text of the resolution is included after the links below.

Read more:


Full Text of the Resolution

General Assembly Resolution # 2006-001

Adopted Sep. 27th, 2006

Whereas, this wise body has been known to be one of strong moral and social conscience and has in the past supported justice and international law, and

Whereas, U.N General Assembly Resolution 194 resolves that the Holy Places - including Nazareth - religious buildings and sites in Palestine should be protected and free access to them assured, in accordance with existing rights and historical practice, and

Whereas, U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194 further resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible, and

Whereas, many of faith, including but not limited to Palestinians, are denied free access to religious buildings and sites, and

Whereas, Palestinian refugees have still not been allowed to return to their homes and allowed the chance to live in peace with their neighbors and furthermore, most of their property has been either demolished or destroyed by Israel and none have been compensated for their losses, and

Whereas, the aforementioned situations prove that Israel clearly and inexcusably is in continued violation of U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194, and

Whereas, U.N Security Council Resolution 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from the territories occupied in the 1967 conflict and the termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force, and

Whereas, the State of Israel violates dozens of U.N. General assembly and Security Council Resolutions, causing conflict and suffering, and

Whereas, the territories of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank (including East Jerusalem), the Golan Heights, and the Sinai Peninsula all were occupied in the 1967 conflict, and

Whereas, all of the aforementioned territories, except for the Sinai Peninsula, are still being illegally occupied by the state of Israel, in violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, and

Whereas, the Fourth Geneva Convention states that the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into territories it occupies, and

Whereas, Israel has continuously displaced indigenous Palestinian civilians and encouraged Israelis to settle in the illegally occupied territories, and

Whereas, this is reaffirmed by U.N. Security Council Resolution 446, which states that "the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East", and

Whereas, Israel has also imposed degrading, humiliating, and inhumane living conditions upon the indigenous Palestinians and this is unacceptable and cannot be justified or excused by those of strong moral and social conscience or those who support international law, and

Whereas, the complete and conscious disregard for Palestinians living under occupation has resulted in excessive use of force leading to tremendous civilian casualties, curfews imposed on entire communities sometimes for weeks on end, state sanctioned destruction of the environment and agriculture of mostly Palestinian lands (often times to build illegal settlements in the Occupied Territories), banning of books by both Arab authors as well as non-Arab authors (including Shakespeare's "Merchant of Venice"), disruption of movement within the West Bank and Gaza Strip at times cutting Palestinians off completely from neighboring areas, loss of the right to an education, organizing, employment, and proper health care, and

Whereas, numerous organizations around the world including but definitely not limited to Amnesty International, the United Nations, the Palestinian Red Crescent, and Israel's B'tselem have highlighted and reprimanded the practices of the Israeli military and the living conditions they impose upon the indigenous Palestinians and deem them to be gross human rights violations, and

Whereas, Israel engaged in a 34 day illegal aggression against the state and people of Lebanon beginning on July 12th, 2006 and ending with a cease fire resolution on August 14th, 2006, and

Whereas, during this 34 day aggression against Lebanon, Amnesty International reported “The Israeli Air Force launched more than 7,000 air attacks on about 7,000 targets in Lebanon between 12 July and 14 August, while the Navy conducted an additional 2,500 bombardments.(1) The attacks, though widespread, particularly concentrated on certain areas. In addition to the human toll -- an estimated 1,183 fatalities, about one third of whom have been children (2), 4,054 people injured and 970,000Lebanese people displaced… In a country of fewer than four million inhabitants, more than 25 per cent of them took to the roads as displaced persons. An estimated 500,000 people sought shelter in Beirut alone, many of them in parks and public spaces, without water or washing facilities… The evidence strongly suggests that the extensive destruction of public works, power systems, civilian homes and industry was deliberate and an integral part of the military strategy, rather than ‘collateral damage’.”

Whereas, the University of Michigan invests in numerous companies and these investments are worth millions of dollars, and

Whereas, Raytheon, General Electric, United Technologies, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman are all directly involved in the Israeli occupation, military aggression and profit from many of Israel's questionable policies in the occupied territories, and

Whereas, the investments in these six companies alone are valued at over $12,000,000, and

Whereas, University policy states that if a particular issue regarding the investment portfolio "involves serious moral or ethical questions," then "an advisory committee consisting of members of the University Senate, students, administration and alumni will be appointed to gather information and formulate recommendations for the Regent's consideration."

Therefore be it Resolved, that the University of Michigan- Dearborn Student Government will lead a movement to collect sufficient petition signatures demanding that the University of Michigan Board of Regents create an advisory committee to investigate the moral and ethical implications of the University's investments in companies that directly support and benefit from the ongoing illegal Israeli occupation, and

Be it Further Resolved, that on behalf of the students at the University of Michigan- Dearborn, we urge this committee to demand that the University of Michigan immediately divest from companies that are directly involved in the ongoing illegal occupation, because we deem these investments to be unethical. These companies may include Raytheon, General Electric, United Technologies, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman, and

Be it Further Resolved, that until Israel abides by international law, specifically but not limited to U.N General Assembly Resolution 194 and U.N. Security Council Resolutions 242, 270, 347, 425, 426, 427, 450, 459, 483, 481, 555, 586, 587, 599, 617, 768, 799, 938, 1288, and 1701 amongst others, we demand that the University cease all investment in companies that financially benefit from the actions of the Israeli military in illegally occupied territories.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Blogger pz said...

This is very much like what the Free Burma Coalition and the Free Nigeria student movements did in the 90's. We had a lot of success and it was passed in many campuses, and later, we targeted cities to pass such resolutions/ordinances. The last major city to pass the Free Burma Ordinace was Los Angeles in 1998. There was much debate because by passing the ordinance, L.A. could no longer do business with major investors in Burma such as ARCO. The resolution passed, and 3 months later ARCO divested all business from Myanmar. Five years later, after most major companies had left Burma because of student movement's passing resolutions, Bush signed a full sanctions on Myanmar. As a note, student movements had been asking for the passing of federal sanctions since early 90's, but the US position was "constructive engagement", but everyone knew the policy was really about letting resource explorations by American companies to continue. As pressure was put on these companies from these local ordinances being passed, one by one major companies like Pepsi, Levis, Unocal, and Arco eventually pulled out. It was only until everyone pulled out that the US decided to conveniently change its "constructive engagement" policy to what the burmese activists had always asked for, full sanctions.

I don't know that this will work with Israel though. Everyone in the US has no problem disagreeing that major human rights violations and the usurping of democracy in Burma has occured, but to get everyone on the same page about Israel is much harder. Furthermore, what made the Free Burma Coaltion successful was it had major funding from people like George Soros, not to mention a lot of volunteers from reputable lawyers who were passionate about the Burma issue. About 85% of the Free Burma Coalition were American students, not Burmese. Just passing the resolutions is hard enough, but the harder part is following up to make sure the Universities/Cities enforce the resolution and actually divest. This can be harder if there is no legal help. I respect the efforts with this divestment resolution, but I'm not sure it will be too successful in the long run.

12:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home